A pastor who I once admired told a young missionary who grew up in his church, after hearing about all that God had done to prepare the way for her to go,
This is a bad time to try to raise funds for missionary service, in this economy and all that.
This from a pastor who has known God’s extravagant provision in bad times, which enabled him to go to seminary and which enabled his church to purchase land a build a church without borrowing a dime.
A pastor who boldly stepped out for other missionaries with a seemingly impossible vision for God’s work in third-world countries, who has seen God provide extravagantly for others in desperate circumstances.
A pastor who at some point, in my opinion, came to place his own ministry above the Lord who ordained it.
This pastor’s “advice” to this young missionary expressed no faith whatsoever in the God who he himself has seen move mountains to equip and place His workers where He willed under circumstances far more challenging than today’s bad economy. The timing is God’s timing. There is profound evidence in the lives of these young missionaries to prove it.
Pastor, would you have advised Abraham not to make his journey to an unknown destination? Would you have been among the ten spies who reported seemingly insurmountable circumstances and urged Moses not to take such a risky adventure? God’s callings and timing rarely make sense when we look at them without the eyes of faith.
What I want to know from you is, what has happened to quench the faith I once marveled at in your life? Surely in your position as an examiner of pastoral candidates in our presbytery, you frequently hear amazing first-hand accounts of how God has brought some of these men to faith and provided for their seminary training and call to preach. Surely you can see His hand in their lives. But why can’t you see His hand in the lives of your own people?
My wife and I have always known that God had an extraordinary work in mind for our daughter. A work which He will accomplish with or without any encouragement from you or financial backing from your church. But how can you pass up an opportunity to continue being a part of that plan, as you were when our kids grew up under your pastoral care and teaching? What has changed, my friend? How can I help?
Praying for you,
Robin
I’ve always been scared of rolling-release Linux distributions. Perhaps because I’ve seen updates break things in other “distros” (geek shorthand for “distributions”). But re-installing the operating system every 6 months is out of the question, and even Ubuntu’s “long term support” versions require re-installation at intervals. I like the idea of a install-and-forget operating system that is maintained in a few simple mouse clicks. Here’s the one I’m testing today, just for grins while I have a half a day of free time.

The Mini KDE desktop with analog clock and weather widget
When I first installed PCLinuxOS I decided ahead of time that KDE would be far too resource-hungry for this modest, aging hardware. I used the “mini” CD to install a minimal KDE version of PCLinuxOS, and figured I’d just tie Xfce on and go with what was not only familiar but proven to run superbly on my computer.
But before I did so, I thought I’d explore this KDE desktop a little just for grins. It wasn’t slow! Maybe adding all the goodies and extras would slow it down, but this “mini” version is quite speedy. KMail is broken (not even installed – I added it, tried it, tried to make it do something, then deleted it after reading a “don’t bother with KMail” post in their forums), but Konquorer is plenty fast, and doubles as a file manager! Not that Dolphin, the default file manager in KDE, is anything to sneeze at. Seems as simple as Thunar and just as fast.
Installation of PCLinuxOS mini is a snap. Once installed, it needs to be updated straight away before adding any new software. Open Synaptic Package Manager, Refresh, Mark All Upgrades, and Apply. That’s basically all the user does to maintain the operating system, presumably for years! It’s an all-or-nothing approach which is kinda scary to a noob like me who fears the “broken after update” scenario more than even having to reinstall. But I’ll explore this KDE desktop a little further and who knows – if it keeps behaving the way it has thus far in PCLinuxOS, maybe I’ll just keep it! PCLOS has some sweet configuration tools that make it simple enough for a sidekick.
My hopes are:
- That KDE won’t become a resource hog before I’ve had a chance to plumb its depths and learn a little,
- that this all-or-nothing update maintenance approach doesn’t prove to be as dangerous as I fear, and
- that even if KDE disappoints me, Xfce will work as reliably on PCLOS as it always did in Xubuntu.
I don’t know what’s going on the “Ubuntu community” lately, but reading their forums one gets the idea that the community is feeling abandoned by the company behind the most popular Linux distro. There’s never been any such corporate shenanigans in the PCLOS community. Us ordinary folks can find the Supreme Developer hanging out in the forums and mailing lists, and the community is vibrant, friendly, and enthusiastic. Most are “ordinary end users” like me, several help develop this sweet distro (also frequently found in the forums), and all are equally enthusiastic about the distro and it’s users.
Well that was fun while it lasted, but:
Yesterday Seamonkey updated twice (using Salix’s Gslapt manager). The first time, no problem except that certain extensions were incompatible with the new version, and none were upgradable. Not a showstopper though, it happens all the time.
Second update restored some extension functionality, but completely removed all my bookmarks, cookies, passwords, history, and saved preferences. And none of them could be input again! Seamonkey would not let me bookmark pages, store passwords, manage folders, cookies, search engines, nothing. Seamonkey was my last resort after Midori, Firefox, and Opera had all buggy prior to installing Seamonkey. Now even trusty old Seamonkey refused me and mocked me at every turn.
I thought about installing yet another browser this morning after a good night’s sleep. No dice. Not even possible. SalixOS refused to boot. Even doing all the tricks to get it going failed. I was beginning to think my computer was broken!

If my version of Salix was available as a LiveCD, I might have used it to at least see if my hard drive had crashed, recover what I could if possible to a USB stick, maybe check my e-mail. But SalixOS 14.0 is only available via an installation disk. But I still had my old Xubuntu 12.04 LiveCD handy, so I used it to see if my hard drive had died or something. It booted up effortlessly as always and guess what? Nothing wrong with the hard drive. SalixOS just simply up and quit on me, just like several applications had been doing since I installed Salix two months ago.
So I grabbed another cup of coffee and thought about it for a spell. Salix had been a little faster than Xubu, but not by enough to matter, especially now that it had come to a screeching halt. Most casual users probably wouldn’t even notice any difference in speed between them (except that Xubu boots a lot faster – Grub beats Lilo). In over two years on Xubuntu I never experienced so many failures of multiple applications as I did in two months using SalixOS. Also, as I thought some more about what to do next, I recalled all the times I wished for a particular software package that:
- Either wasn’t in the SalixOS repositories or
- did not appear in available Slackbuilds or refused to install from Slackbuilds.
The old saying is true: Choose a distro, and you’re choosing it’s repositories. There are a gazillion applications in the Ubuntu respositories (although it’s odd that you have to add PPAs to get the Seamonkey Internet suite or the Faenza icon set – both of which are in the Salix respositories). By comparison though, I could list every bit of software in the Salix repositories on about two ordinary printed pages. Others can be compiled from Slackbuilds using Sourcery, but there are all kinds of dependency issues. Enough to have it fail to install what I wanted at least 50% of the time.
So after careful, thoughtful, thorough consideration of my situation, I decided, “Screw this. I’ll just install Xubu replacing Salix while I’ve got the darned CD in there anyway.” I had thought to dual boot, but that idea lasted about 3 minutes before I dismissed it, considering all the ups and downs of the last 2 months using SalixOS. I had ventured away from Xubu because I’m scared of updates breaking things. I’ve read a lot of horror stories about that – but it occurs to me that I’ve never actually experienced any such horrific, disastrous, cataclysmic breakages in Xubuntu for as long as I’ve used. Just minor ones, like sound not working or having to reinstall some peripheral stuff. So y’know what?

It’s back to Xubuntu, no more to roam, until and unless Xubuntu fails me as badly as SalixOS did. Oh well, no one said Linux was boring I guess. But in my opinion, it should be. At least on my desktop!

ll his life, my brother has dreamed of being a professional musician. He has the talent for it, but none of the discipline to achieve it. Chronically unemployed and homeless, a life without responsibility is familiar and comfortable to him. A real job and a real place of his own come with the responsibility to pay bills, show up for work when he should, obey his boss, and otherwise fulfill the obligations that inevitably come with independence. Countless times he has been offered a home and job to pay for it, and each time he has sabotaged his own success when the commensurate responsibility required his attention. So, back on the street again, angry and bitter and resentful of the boss who fired him, or the landlord that insisted on being paid rent, or the countless parade of people who finally stopped “helping” him with cash and rides and housing and food when their own money began to run out.
The cycle repeats, over and over again, for nearly 40 years now. But this time the danger to my brother is far greater than just physical or financial. His dream of being “a professional musician” has finally come true. A tiny pseudo-church (arguably illegitimate as a true church) has hired him to be their minister of music.
His heart and mind continue to be consumed by bitterness and resentment of all those who have tried to help him in the past with jobs, financial gifts, housing, job training, transportation, and all the rest. He continues to blame them – especially his own family and churches – for his lifelong chronic homelessness and joblessness and poverty. But now he is in a position of ministry, with his heart still full of venom and resentment towards fellow believers. But this “job” is much more than just a position as a compensated musician. It carries far greater responsibility than just playing the guitar skillfully and delivering a good musical performance. This is not a job as an entertainer, but as a minister!
Even though in my opinion the little “church” that hired him is not a true church, the danger is no less real there because the people who attend services there believe it’s a church and follow their leaders. Being in ministry without the spiritual purity that ministry demands is a frightening prospect. In fact it has been fear of becoming a false minister that drove me to drop out of seminary!
His “professional musician” gig will most certainly be as short-lived as any of his previous jobs. But the responsibility of ministry weighs heavier than any other vocation, demanding much more than just “playing a good song.” And the danger to his soul in the day of judgment is far greater in ministry than it would be if he just played in a local bar. God help him.
Hi readers!
I had a little time today after a glorious Resurrection Day worship service and a casual supper with family, to throw on a few new desktop wallpapers and take a few screenshots to show off my new SalixOS operating system. Very basic and very simple, it’s surprising that a computer dunce like me can use – <gasp!> Slackware of all things! But SalixOS makes Slackware easy for (kinda sorta) inexperienced users taking their first steps out of the spoon-feeding, one-size-fits-all Linux distro I have used for the past two years. I never have toyed with Docky or Conky yet, but those are probably next on my list. Not that I’m unhappy with the good ol’ Xfce panel with the goodies I’ve always enjoyed. But screenshots of Docky and Conky look so geeky and cool that it might be fun, when time permits, to mess around with them. I’ve got a lot of reading to do first though! And it’s a good idea, when you’re experimenting, to keep a written record of everything you do and what happened when you did. I’ll add the new toys to my “Linux journal.”
So here’s the first shot – just the desktop with nothing open. This is what greets me about 20 seconds after power-up:

My old Xubu desktop actually used a different window manager called Compiz. It made open windows appear translucent when I was working in another. Okay, so it looked cool, but SalixOS has a sensible “one application per task” approach to their mixture. So since this is an Xfce desktop, it just uses the Xfce window manager (Xfcewm). I could enable some cool effects I suppose, but the whole reason I’ve switched from Xubuntu was to regain the speed and simplicity that was being lost with every new update. Until recently, Xubuntu was aimed at “older, modest hardware.” That doesn’t seem to be the case anymore. I think that, with the arrival of Unity and Canonical’s departure from the Gnome desktop, that Xubuntu serves more as an alternative to Unity rather than as a distro intended for modest machines with lesser resources. For that there’s Lubuntu now, and I’ve read that it fits the bill nicely. So here’s my desktop with a few apps open: The terminal, the pdf viewer, and Thunar, the default file manager which is kind of growing on me as I get used to it.

Oh, did you spot that Diaspora document in my Downloads folder? I was thinkin’ ’bout getting back on that social network again. It offers some cool new features like formatting posts and comments (try that in Facebook – maybe someday, if you pay extra for that) and using #hashtags instead of joining groups to read stuff that interests you. But that’s a whole ‘nother post for some other day. Today I’m showing off my sexy speedy SalixOS desktop! On the right, there, is the SalixOS Startup Guide opened up for me to learn about the terminal. It’s quite different in Slackware from the Debian/Ubuntu apt-get sudo and all that. Not any more complicated so far, just different. All I’ve really done so far in the terminal is look around a bit, and use it to gain root access to Thunar so I could move some files around “as root.” There’s much more there to explore, but not without my journal and a lot more reading first.
I am still absolutely delighted with SalixOS. Midori hasn’t crashed even once, despite having multiple windows open and video streaming. It’s much faster and more responsive than Xubuntu was, and no daily flood of major updates to scare the heck out of me. This old computer is nearly 10 years old, and with SalixOS on it, I think it could go another 10 years with none of the slowdowns and crashes and freezes and such that frustrated me my last several months as a Xubu user.
Thanks for reading!
This is me tinkering with Linux again.
Yesterday and today I’m testing SalixOS 14.0 on an identical computer to my own desktop computer, a Dell Dimension with an old Celeron processor and 512 of RAM.

SalixOS 14.0 is not available as a LiveCD yet. You can get the previous version, 13.7 as a LiveCD to “test drive” without making changes to your hard drive, but it has an older version of Xfce on it. The new version (4.10) has a bunch of changes and it’s not like the Ubuntu-style metapackages I’m used to. It’s designed so you can install components in a non-Xfce environment, which is kinda cool. I suppose if you want LXDE but with an Xfce panel and the Xfce goodies you can do that now. At the time of this posting the only way to “test” SalixOS 14.0 is to install it to a hard drive or use it in a virtual environment (which I’ve never done). But the installer is effortless, fast, and easy to follow. It even offers recommendations and information to help you decide how to proceed at each step.
If I were to reduce my review down to a single sentence, I would say that what Ubuntu has done for Debian, SalixOS is trying to do for Slackware. Except that Salix is still fully compatible with it’s parent distro, and Ubuntu is definitely not.
SalixOS is easy, simple, and fast. But it “feels” older even though all the software is up-to-date. That’s prob’ly just the default configuration, easily changed in Xfce as always. I’ll offer some screenshots in later posts, probably.
Salix doesn’t “do it all for you” the way Xubuntu always did. You need to manually set up the little conveniences like “print to pdf” and such, but newbie-friendly instructions are available on the Wiki. Some big differences between Salix and Xubuntu are: Lilo as the default boot manager (but you can choose Grub on installation if you prefer it), LibreOffice instead of Abiword and Gnumeric, the newest version of the ultralight Midori web browser instead of Firefox version Twelve Zillion.0, Claws-Mail instead of Thunderbird, good ol’ reliable ALSA instead of PulseAudio, etc. Another nice feature is Salix’s “keep it simple” approach. One application per task. That’s why it all still fits on a CD instead of a big ol’ DVD. Even Xubuntu has seen the last of it’s releases that will still fit on a CD.
Adding and removing software is as easy in Salix as it is in Xubuntu’s Synaptic Package Manager (I never cared for the Ubuntu Software Center anyway – I always delete that resource-hogging eye candy from a new install of Xubuntu), using the GSlapt package manager for Slackware stuff, and Sourcery, a Synaptic-like compiler with supposedly good dependency support. Dependency support is one of the strong points of Debian/Ubuntu’s apt-get package management, but it can also get “messy” and pull in other who-knows-what stuff along with it. I don’t know if any of that accounts for some slow-downs in Xubuntu or not, or if it’s just the fact that it updates so often and sometimes a software update in one bit of software hinders or cripples another bit of software.
Speaking of updates: Kernel upgrades are still fast and furious in Xubuntu 12.01 LTS (I even got two kernel updates in a single week!) and they tend to scare me. I reboot after one of those updates and pray that it still works! “Broken by an update” is a frequent complaint in the ‘buntu family, but it just does not happen in SalixOS. Ever. Looking at their forums, I see not a single thread about an update breaking something. That is major. Between the ultra-long-term support and rock-solid stability of Slackware, and the ease and simplicity of the Salix tools, I may not even bother to look any further for a new “default” Linux distro for home use. I just don’t need all the extra fluff and hand-holding stuff that makes Xubuntu such a great choice for new Linux users.
The only surprise is the size of the software repositories. Perhaps I was a little spoiled using Debian and Ubuntu repositories which are vast, huge storehouses of amazing software. The Salix/Slackware repos are much smaller. I guess the saying is true: “Choose a distro and you choose a repository too.” But about that: I’d much rather have a smaller repository of absolutely rock-stable software that will not conflict with other software or be broken by frequent updates than to have a huge, vast, confusing library to wade through. Besides, the Sourcery compiler (unique to Salix) should allow me to safely add a few other favorite applications, and having a favorite one added is is easy as asking for it. Win/win.
I’m a busy sidekick and haven’t got a lot of time for playing around and tinkering with Linux distros the way I used to. I’ll just use my Salix computer as I normally use my Xubuntu one and if it continues to impress me as it has so far, I’ll likely not bother to look any further.
I give SalixOS 14.0 seven Penguins out of ten for simplicity, reliability, stability, beauty, configurability, and versatility.
____________
UPDATE: The Sourcery app looks pretty cool and attempts to address dependency issues, but it has proved to be unreliable. It has failed me at least half the time. Applications began freezing or locking up after a few weeks. Thunderbird, Firefox, Midori, Opera, and then Seamonkey all worked for the first few days of use, then either froze up or lost all my settings and passwords and bookmarks and such and refused to let me restore them. I ran Bleachbit to clean up and start over, but the same results repeated themselves. Updates were buggy, sometimes coming within a few minutes of each other and sometimes conflicting with prior updates. That completely floored me because of Slackware’s wonderful reputation for not having update issues. Saturday unintentionally became my last day as a Salix user when it refused to boot at all and balked at every attempt to fix it.
“Full” Preterism is the idea that all biblical prophecy has already been fulfilled. I prefer to call that, hyper-preterism! Historically the majority report in Christianity, until little more than 100 years ago, taught what is usually termed “partial” preterism – that most biblical prophecy has been fulfilled, but some things remain yet future. I prefer to call this orthodox preterism.
As a child I heard only the popular Dispensationalist view, and assumed that all Christians believed the same stuff I had been taught. Until I studied Church History a bit and discovered that today’s majority report on eschatology (the study of “last things”) was unheard of before the Second Great Awakening. The closest thing to it was something called “chialism” (today known as “historic premillennialism”), but it was by no means ever the generally accepted eschatology of the Church, before or after the Bishop of Rome’s claim of superior authority above all other Bishops.
Following my study of both secular and church history, I have come to adopt the historic teaching of Christendom throughout most of it’s history. I am an Orthodox Preterist. Here is why:
The events in Jerusalem in the year 70 A.D. are amazing and compelling! A summary of Rome’s war against Jerusalem can be found in an ordinary encyclopedia, but the accounts of eyewitness historians are absolutely mind boggling. To get the benefit of both sides, one should read the accounts of both sides, so to avoid the inevitable twisting of history written by the victor. Fortunately we have accounts from both sides: Josephus, a Jewish priest and eyewitness, wrote a compelling account of those days; and the Roman eyewitness Tacitus wrote an account from the Roman perspective. Both are absolutely fascinating, and both accounts read like apocalyptic visions!
Historically, orthodox Christianity has taught that the events of 70 A.D. represent a “judgment coming of Christ” upon the generation that rejected Him. It is not to be seen as the Second Coming, but rather as the final aspect of His first advent (coming). In this judgment upon that single generation (see Matt 23:36 and 24:34), He used Roman troops to put a permanent end to the entire Old Testament system that prefigured His finished work on the Cross. The “last days” means the last days OF THAT COVENANT.
In the Olivet prophecy of Matthew 23 and 24, the Lord Jesus describes this judgment in details which we are more accustomed to associating with the end of the world! When we read about the stars falling from the sky, the sun going dark, and the moon turning to blood, we tend to think of planetary catastrophe, worldwide nuclear annihilation, or something like that. When we read, “the Son of Man coming on the clouds of the sky” we tend to associate that with the Second Coming and the end of the world. When we read about a great trumpet blast and the gathering of the Elect from the four winds we think of “the Rapture.” When Jesus used those terms in Matthew 24, He was quoting Old Testament scriptures which referred to the conquest of Israel and Judah (in Isa 13) by the Assyrians and Babylonians. Such language is also used by Ezekiel in describing the conquest of Egypt by Babylon (32:7). It also describes the events of 70 AD, and further describes the Second Advent as well.
The Jewish historian Josephus, who witnessed the destruction of Jerusalem and the years following it, wrote describing the celestial signs leading up to Jerusalem’s conquest and the destruction of the Temple:
Thus were the miserable people persuaded by these deceivers, and such as belied God Himself; while they did not attend, nor give credit, to the signs that were so evident and did so plainly foretell their future desolation; but, like men infatuated, without either eyes to see or minds to consider, did not regard the denunciations that God made to them. Thus there was a star resembling a sword, which stood over the city, and a comet, that continued a whole year. Thus also, before the Jews’ rebellion, and before those commotions which preceded the war, when the people were come in great crowds to the feast of unleavened bread, on the eighth day of the month Xanthicus [Nisan], and at the ninth hour of the night, so great a light shone round the altar and the holy house, that it appeared to be bright daytime; which light lasted for half an hour. This light seemed to be a good sign to the unskillful, but was so interpreted by the sacred scribes as to portend those events that followed immediately upon it. 1
R.C. Sproul, in his book, The Last Days According to Jesus, writes:
Josephus says these astronomical phenomena triggered false prophecies of hope for Jerusalem and it’s people. … The bright light shining round the temple area may be related to the Shekina glory, the sign of God’s presence. False prophets read it in much the same way that false prophets in Old Testament times viewed the coming day of the Lord – as a time of unqualified weal, a day of brightness and glory. This missed the dreadful darkness that would accompany it as a sign of judgment.2
Other signs in the sky were reported by other historians recording events
surrounding the destruction of Jerusalem. The Roman historian Tacitus writes:
Besides the manifold misfortunes that befell mankind, there were prodigies in the sky and on the earth, warnings given by thunderbolts, and prophecies of the future, both joyful and gloomy, uncertain and clear. For never was it more fully proved by awful disasters of the Roman people or by indubitable signs that the gods care not for our safety, but for our punishment.3
In addition to his account of the comet, the prophecies, the sword-like star, etc., Josephus records an even more astonishing celestial event that seems to be a quite literal fulfillment of Ezekiel 1 :22-28 (not quoted here, but read it and be amazed!). Here’s Josephus again:
Besides these, a few days after that feast, on the one and twentieth day of the month Artimisius [Jyar], a certain prodigious and incredible phenomenon appeared; I suppose the account of it would seem to be a fable, were it not related by those that saw it, and were not the events that followed it of so considerable a nature as to deserve such signals; for, before sun-setting, chariots and troops of soldiers in their armor were seen running about the clouds, and surrounding of cities. Moreover at that feast which we call Pentecost, as the priests were going by night into the inner [court of the] temple, as their custom was, to perform their sacred ministrations, they said that, in the first place, they felt a quaking, and heard a great noise, and after that they heard a sound as of a great multitude, saying, “Let us remove hence.”4
I believe personally that “the end of the age” as often used in scripture to refer to “the last days,” means the end of the Jewish age – or the end of the old Mosaic covenant, and that the Lord’s presence did indeed depart from the temple before it was decimated. There is absolutely no doubt as to the celestial signs that took place and accelerated in the years immediately preceding the destruction of Jerusalem. Some Roman military officers wrote accounts of soldiers deserting (a death penalty offense) for fear at the signs in the earth and sky during those turbulent days that saw the rise and fall of 6 emperors (and a pretended Nero who allegedly recovered from an assassination).
Because the Jewish age ended in 70 AD, because the Olivet discourse of Matthew 23 and 24 was so literally fulfilled, and because the Apostle Paul ascribed “a sign to unbelievers” as the meaning of tongues, and because the prophecies of the period, according to Josephus, Tacitus, and others, foretold great destruction and judgment upon Israel (including the end of temple sacrifices by the way), that is why I believe the signs ceased when the things they signified came to pass.
Christian Orthodoxy has always taught – up until Dispensational Premillennialism took hold a little more than 100 years ago – that we are in “the Millennium” right now! The “millennial” Kingdom began after the way was prepared by John the Baptist, when Christ arrived. This kingdom is not of this world, though it exists in the world. It is forever, it is expanding and liberating millions, and will reign completely at the close of this “millennium” when Christ returns to destroy the last enemy. Satan is bound! Is Christ not even now ascended to His throne at the right hand of God the Father (Colossians 3:1)? Are we not even now seated in heavenly places with Him (Ephesians 2:6)? Has He not already given His church authority to bind and loose in His name (Matthew 16:17-19)? Jesus demonstrated His authority over Satan by casting out demons, having “bound the strong man” during His earthly ministry. Satan is bound in this present millennial kingdom.
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic
apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, mprovident
habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of
commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the
followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and
refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that
in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the
influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of
those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from
being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the
science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization
of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient
Rome.”
Sir Winston Churchill; (Source: The River War, first edition,
Vol. II, pages 248-50 London)
Churchill saw it coming.
This was written about 100 years ago.
Kierkegaard is known for many great writings, some controversial. Here is one of his little-known ones that hits the mark and has relevance in today's popular "gospel offer" in which God becomes a useful provider to us "in exchange" for our "service" to Him, - as if He needed human help! Enjoy.
Dependence on Sources.
An excellent description of why the “just me, my Bible, and the Holy Spirit to guide me” hermeneutic is in fact unbiblical as well as dangerous.
Next Page »